“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a long way they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final found.
Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal to your case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners might request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons getting their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
Article 27 with the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the clear negation in the legislation laid down with the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
Petitioner owning been declared an absconder in this case for over a person and also a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may well avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution from the case. The material on record makes the case from the petitioner falls under two exceptions into the rule of grant of bail as mentioned earlier mentioned.
The issue here is that an accused may perhaps say that they intended to injure the target, but they did not intend to get rid of them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted mainly because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor supposed.
Section 302 with the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be issue to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
When the petitioner is solely present on the place of event without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in these circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided from the acquired trial Court after recording from the evidence.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses which include self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may result in reduced charges or acquittal.
Regardless of its popularity, not many may perhaps be familiar with its intricacies. This article check here is definitely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section as well as the incredibly very low threshold that governs it.
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to improving the effectiveness of your law in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--